john downing: 'government needs to make hard choices on universities' - blank brass name plates

It is an emotion as old as politics itself.
Dell veterans once satirized: "We need a minister of lettum, because lettum will never get anything before he gets his own minister.
So when there is a big problem with any particular department, we will seek to "give it a minister's own response ".
It doesn't change much.
But it could reduce the political heat for a while.
He therefore called for the establishment of a specialized department of higher education --
From June 1997 to January 2000, he served as Minister of Education.
Over the years, with the restructuring of government departments, brass sculptors have been busy making new nameplates
Name, move to a different location, and give a new gloss through a different arrangement.
We have gone through a stage of appointing a dedicated junior minister to create the impression of a campaign around a problem that is causing bad publicity.
This trend continues, and until today we have Jim Daley and Michael Darcy, who are in charge of the elderly, struggling with rising premiums.
There are even twists and turns in the names of departments, such as foreign ministry officials, who in theory expressed their willingness to tarnish their business by adding the word "trade" to the title.
For some time in the 1980 s, there was a lot of public hands.
The Ministry of Education was disturbed by the lack of emphasis on science, adding the word "science" to the title.
Recently, the department acknowledged the lack of apprenticeship and skill development by adding the word "skills" to the title.
This makes people wonder why "science" has disappeared from the named grid.
Of course, changes in things and the configuration of government departments must reflect this reality.
We no longer need a land department to deal with the changes brought about by landowners and big estates, nor a supply department to deal with the necessary rationing during the war.
Again, we must admit that there is a big problem with our third question --level sector.
This is mainly related to insufficient funds and the government's failure to make some difficult decisions in this aspect of the election.
We have entered the stage of expert research and reporting.
Three years ago, those options were listed in the report of a group led by union leader Peter Cassells.
The center of choice is to abolish the contribution of students and to establish a country dominated by the state. funded system;
Continue to collect current student dues while increasing state investment;
And the introduction of income-
Associated loan system.
Our politicians have to choose.
A new independent third
The education sector will not change the need to make difficult choices about scarce resources.
Everyone in the audience will not work here.