name badge manufacturers As Wikipedia moves to S.F., founder discusses planned changes

WALES29_035_LH.JPG Wikipedia Liz havria/Chronicle/San Francisco/11/29/07 * Jimmy Wales cq founder Jimmy Wales: 11-30-2007 Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said that testing in Germany could reduce the frequency of website vandalism.LessWALES29_035_LH.JPG Wikipedia Liz havria/Chronicle/San Francisco/11/29/07 * Jimmy Wales cq founder Jimmy Wales: 11-30-2007 Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said that testing in Germany could reduce the frequency of website vandalism.The popular online encyclopedia, created and edited by the masses, leswikipedia is on the risePeterborough, FloridaTake root and replant in San Francisco and plan to grow business there.It has found office space near the city's South Park, which is the center of Web 2.0 development, about six new employees are being recruited.San Francisco, partly because of its height.The technical community will also be the scene of the next action of the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that oversees Wikipedia.Wikipedia was founded in 2001 by Jimmy Wales.Org has grown into the sixth of the Web-The largest website in 244.According to comScore, a company that tracks Internet traffic, there were 5 million visitors in October.It also changes the nature of the online reference tool.According to its own statistics, it now includes more than 9.1 million articles in 252 languages, all made by users.The English version alone includes some 2.1 million entries, from the plot and details of Walt Disney's latest film, Magic, to geological analysis of the Valley of Death area.Wiki software allows people to make changes automatically, encouraging anyone from all over the world to contribute to Wikipedia articles.This means that experts in various fields can work together to create an up Directoryto-the-minute data.But it is also criticized for inaccurate information and the mischief of deliberately inserting nasty or inappropriate comments.Wales, who is also together in 2004Wikia started the company., a for-San Mateo's profit wiki company is very philosophical about the process.Wales in an interview with The Chronicle this week --He travels between a family home in Florida and an apartment in the city.Shared his plans for Wikipedia, including testing a project that helps protect the site from repeated vandalism.Q: Why is the Wikimedia Foundation developing?A: The number of things that continue to happen continues to increase.For example, we need more technicians to move the software forward faster and help manage and keep the website running.Because we don't need that much money, we never do a good job of raising money.But as a charity, we have a lot of ambition to expand our support for people who work in the language of the developing world, and basically try to bring Wikipedia to more people in the world.Q: Will we see changes in Wikipedia?A: Currently working on bringing in WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") edits, but this is A very tricky issue.We have always wanted (editing experience) to be approachable and can be done by anyone.As we add more features, it will be more complicated for newcomers to edit.More like a familiar editing experience like Microsoft Word-We hope to achieve that.Q: Are you planning to add more audio and video features?A: There is not much community demand for this.The encyclopedia itself is text.Audio or video is a bit tricky because it's hard to edit together.People can submit something, but you can't fix it if you don't like it, so it doesn't fit our style.The biggest changes will be tried out on German Wikipedia first.Now, we have to protect the item if someone is causing trouble.But what we would rather do is give everything to the editor at all times.Instead of protecting people from not being able to edit, we will have new people editing, so if we don't know that they are part of the community, they won't be online immediately.Only when the community sees it will they live.Q:Why Germany?A: This is a stereotype, but the Germans are very enthusiastic about quality.They really want to move in the direction of solving the problem.The motivation to destroy Wikipedia is that people will see it and think it's interesting.(But) if you know that no one will see it except some Wikipedia volunteers, they just ignore it and maybe people will destroy it less.On the other hand, we do not know what impact this will have on participation.People like instant feedback.You edit, it will be displayed immediately on the website in real time.It's really exciting for newcomers, so if they don't have that experience, will they be discouraged?So we have to give it a try.Another reason is that (Wikipedia, Germany) is the secondThe largest WikipediaIf we do it in English, French and other big languages, it's big enough to be representative.Q: Are you worried that the process will be less democratic?Some people are idiots, some people are not.You have to acknowledge this and authorize good people to control the quality.But we have always been very open to people who are involved and new to join.We know that the current system is effective, and we know that it has certain weaknesses and advantages.We hope to address these weaknesses without losing our strengths.Q: Do you plan to add other Web 2.0 elements such as ranking entries or users or providing user profiles?A: Probably not.The metrics for rating users are not considered because we can't see anything useful there.If you imagine you found a job in a place where you need to wear a name badge, but on that badge it says how many people like you and don't like you, it's not a healthy social environment.You have a system of points...People start to do everything they can to increase the scores they get, which can be the right behavior or not the right one.Q: Do you think we are in Web 2?0 bubble?A: So far, this sense of prosperity is much more rational than it was before.There is now a business model for functionality and work.Companies can actually see how to make a profit.Some of them, not all of them, will.I see criticism from some companies and I think it works.If you are building a company and your business model is to get enough traffic to sell to Google, you may have problems.Q: Wikipedia has launched the Wiki campaign to enable users to create and edit websites.How do you like your copy?I think it's cool.I want to see more.I think we're still at the beginning of our users.Generate content.You can think of plenty of examples where people can work together and build together.Some things will be vague, but like in a bookstore...There is no book about birds.1 best-sellers.They are stable things.For me, the amateur bird watching community can easily build a bird together --Look at the guide and keep it updated, modified to make it useful and more comprehensive.I don't think we see almost everything we're going to see.Q: Are you worried that people will feel at some point that their work here is done?I used to worry.Part of the appeal of Wikipedia's early days is that you can click on Africa, there's nothing there, and you're probably the first person to type, "Africa is a continent."Given that it's a bit difficult in English to write a whole new article about something that doesn't exist yet.You're writing a rather vague topic.But we haven't seen a decline in engagement.It continues to grow.Q: Are you worried that people will suddenly decide that they don't want to contribute for free and ask for a fee?We haven't seen anything like that yet...Because it's interesting.My rant is against the word "crowdsourcing" and I think it's a mean, mean way to see the world.A good business model is the idea of letting the public do your job for freeIt's crazy.It does not respect the people.Just like you tried to cheat them to work for free.What you really have to do is provide people with a good place to do what they want.We will use advertising to build this social place and only come when we provide people with the tools and social environment they need to entertain.If the by-This product is some amazing work, which is also great.